AI Code Governance

Every AI-generated code change. Reviewed. Logged. Audit-ready.

Tamper-proof governance for every pull request. Judgment receipts for every PR. Deploys as a GitHub Action. Works with your existing pipeline.

Sign UpRequest a Demo
SOC 2HIPAAPCI DSSDORAEU AI ActISO 27001
GUARDSPINE JUDGMENT RECEIPTv0.2.1
#47Add user authentication middleware
sarah-engacme-corp/payments-api247 linesL3CONDITIONS
Reviewers
Claude Sonnet 4.5
request_changes
GPT-4o
approve
Gemini 2.5 Flash
request_changes
Findings
CRITICALHardcoded database password in connection string
HIGHSession tokens stored without encryption
MEDIUMMissing rate limiting on auth endpoint
LOWConsole.log statements in production code
Consensus: 67% agreement | 2 rounds
Sanitization: 3 secrets redacted
Risk: passwordsessiontokencredential
bundle_hash: sha256:9f3a...c7e1
root_hash: sha256:2d81...a4f9
timestamp: 2026-03-15T14:22:08Z
TAMPER-EVIDENT BY DESIGN

Proof that can't be forged.

Every review step -- prompt, model output, findings, consensus -- is individually hashed and chained into a tamper-evident bundle. Modify one byte and the entire chain breaks. No proprietary format. SHA-256 end to end.

PROMPT HASH
SHA-256 of raw prompt
MODEL REVIEWERS
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT-4o
Gemini 2.5 Flash
FINDINGS
4 findings hashed
CONSENSUS
67% agreement, 2 rounds
BUNDLE HASHVERIFIED
sha256:9f3a...c7e1
THE COST OF DOING NOTHING

How much un-audited AI code ships every month?

168,000
lines of AI code / month
$230,400
annual manual review cost
$399/mo
GuardSpine price
Want the full math? Calculate your ROI →
THE GOVERNANCE GAP

Every unchecked commit is a breach waiting for a subpoena.

AI writes code faster than your team can review it. Regulators are not slowing down. The gap between what ships and what is governed grows every sprint. GuardSpine closes it -- automatically, on every PR, with cryptographic proof.

Aug 2026
EU AI Act enforcement deadline
1,100+
US state AI bills introduced
2.74x
More vulnerabilities in AI-generated code
JUDGMENT RECEIPTS

Structured proof that governance happened.

Risk Tier Assigned
Every PR is classified L0-L4 based on file patterns, sensitive zones, and change size.
Models That Reviewed
Multiple AI models review independently. No single model decides alone.
Independent Findings
Each reviewer produces findings before seeing the others. No groupthink.
Cross-Check Results
Round 2 anonymous cross-check. Models evaluate each other's findings.
Consensus Decision
Majority vote with ties breaking strictest. Agreement score quantified.
Hash Chain
SHA-256 chain from prompt to bundle. One bit changes, the whole chain breaks.
HOW IT WORKS

Your engineers install a GitHub Action. You get the dashboard.

For your engineering team
✓Add one YAML file to the repo
✓Reviews trigger on every pull request
✓Results appear as PR comments
✓No new tool, no context switching
For you
✓Dashboard shows every reviewed PR
✓Evidence bundles for auditors on demand
✓Compliance mapping across SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI
✓Export-ready reports -- no manual assembly
The adoption problem is solved by design. Engineers never leave GitHub. Leadership never asks engineers to fill out a form. The governance evidence is a byproduct of the existing workflow.
OPEN SOURCE

You should not trust a proprietary tool to audit your code.

The review engine is open source under Apache 2.0. You can read the code, fork it, run it offline. Evidence bundles are verified with an open-source tool. No vendor lock-in for the core governance function.

View on GitHub
evidence-bundle.json
{
  "bundle_hash": "sha256:9f3a...c7e1",
  "root_hash": "sha256:2d81...a4f9",
  "prompt_hash": "sha256:7b2c...e3d8",
  "reviewers": [
    { "model": "claude-sonnet-4.5", "response_hash": "sha256:..." },
    { "model": "gpt-4o", "response_hash": "sha256:..." },
    { "model": "gemini-2.5-flash", "response_hash": "sha256:..." }
  ],
  "consensus": { "decision": "CONDITIONS", "agreement": 0.67 },
  "timestamp": "2026-03-15T14:22:08Z"
}
700+ testsApache 2.0BYOKOffline verify
COMPLIANCE

Maps to the frameworks you are already audited against.

SOC 2
Evidence mapped to controls
HIPAA
Evidence mapped to controls
PCI DSS
Evidence mapped to controls
ROADMAP
EU AI Act
Mapping in progress
ROADMAP
DORA
Mapping in progress
ROADMAP
ISO 27001
Mapping in progress
GuardSpine complements Vanta and Drata. They prove your infrastructure is configured. We prove your code changes were governed. Your auditor gets both.
PRICING

Starts at less than your Drata bill.

Starter
$399/mo
$4,788/yr
✓1 repo
✓Up to 5 users
✓Email support
✓Community Slack
POPULAR
Team
$1,600/mo
$19,200/yr
✓Up to 10 repos
✓Up to 25 users
✓Priority support
✓Custom rubric packs
Org
$10,000/mo
$115,200/yr
✓Unlimited repos
✓Unlimited users
✓Dedicated CSM
✓SSO / SAML
Enterprise
Custom
Contact us
✓Air-gapped deploy
✓On-prem Ollama
✓Custom integrations
✓SLA guarantee
Platform fee, not per-seat. Add engineers without changing your bill.
THE TEAM

Built by operators, not observers.

David Youssef
David Youssef
CEO & Architect

10 years in enterprise sales and AI adoption. Designed the governance architecture from first principles. Published researcher.

Igor Malovitsa
Igor Malovitsa
CTO

13 years in systems engineering. Rust, cryptography, distributed systems. MSc in Physics. Builds the things that can't break.

FAQ

Common questions

COMPARISON

AI Code Governance Tools -- Structured Comparison

FeatureGuardSpineSnykSonarQubeGitHub Advanced Security
Multi-model AI reviewYes (3+)NoNoCopilot only
Tamper-evident hash chainSHA-256NoNoNo
Judgment receiptsYesNoNoNo
Compliance mappingBuilt-inPartialPartialNo
Open-source engineApache 2.0ProprietaryCommunityProprietary
BYOKYesNoN/ANo
Offline verificationYesNoNoNo
Pricing modelPlatform feePer-seatPer-seatPer-seat

See how GuardSpine produces audit-ready evidence for every code change.

Starts at $399/mo. Platform fee, not per-seat.

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your trial request.

Open-source engine|Evidence verified offline|BYOK -- no inference costs